|
|
| Focus |
Group trustworthiness |
| Materials |
Blindfolds (optional) |
| Directions |
You will need a large space, such as
a gym, cafeteria, or field. Everyone gets
a partner and creates a word or phrase
that goes together. Examples are: "Salt
and Pepper," "Fire and Hydrant," "To
Be and Not To Be." They assign one
of these as their "name" for
the duration of the activity.
Each person in the pair goes to the opposite
side of the room or field. They put on
the blindfolds or close their eyes. Two
people (generally facilitators) are sighted
and charged with keeping the participants
from running into objects or walls. The
object of the activity is for partners
to find each other by calling out their
yells for "Pepper" "Hydrant" yells
for Everyone gets into a "bumpers
up" position with hands in front and
on a signal, begins calling for their partner.
The activity ends when all partners have
found each other. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Hog Call) |
- Why did you choose to take (or not
take) a blindfold?
- How did you prove your trustworthiness
to other people?
- How do other people prove their trustworthiness
to you?
- Did you feel the need to peek?
- Why or why not?
|
Facilitation
notes |
This activity gives participants the
opportunity to explore how trusting they
feel of the other people in the group.
Make sure to give people the option to
wear a blindfold if they want or to just
close their eyes. Why did they choose one
over the other? Was it a comfort issue
or a trust issue? Did they like the idea
of having the option of being able to open
their eyes if necessary? Remember that
according to Challenge by Choice, peeking
is acceptable.
This activity keeps the focus on the total
group, as opposed to having to trust one
or two other people. This is good discussion
material because we are constantly in situations
where we need to trust groups of other
people, some of whom we do not even know
(i.e., when on the road and having to trust
other drivers).
As a facilitator, it is necessary to make
sure people move at an appropriate speed
and to watch for people veering off into
an obstacle or wall. Warn the group that
you may put your hand on their shoulder
to alert them to something in their path.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Working with others; Trustworthiness |
| Materials |
Large hula hoops and blindfolds (optional) |
| Directions |
This is an outdoor activity. Groups
of three are formed and each group receives
a hula hoop. Each small group will set
their own goal of where they want to go,
i.e., "We want to go from the flagpole
to that pine tree." Describe three
roles, "golfer" "golf director." Both
the golfer (who has the hula hoop) and
the hole have their eyes closed. The "director" can
see, but may not touch the hula hoop. To
get to their goal, they must do the following:
The hole stands with his/her hands over
his/her head and the "golfer" must
throw the hoop over them. The "golf
director" verbally guides the "golfer" through
the steps. The "golfer" must
throw the hoop. Distance between "golfer" is
up to the team. If the hoop goes over the "hole" the
team changes roles and the new "hole" stands
closer to the goal. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Human Golf) |
- Were you nervous at any point during
this activity?
- What did your team do to make people
feel more comfortable?
- Did you trust that your team members
would not hurt you?
- What strategies did you use to accomplish
your goal?
|
Facilitation
notes |
It may be helpful to model a throw for
the group before groups start. Make sure
to show how throws are gentle and high.
Also ask the "hole" to stand
with their backs to the "golfer" so
that they do not accidentally get hit in
the face. People generally enjoy this activity,
finding it less risky than they perceived
it to be when the directions were given.
Once people become more comfortable with
it, they begin experimenting with different
ways to throw the hoop and trying longer
throws.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Individual and group trustworthiness;
Communication; Goal setting |
| Materials |
Boundary markers, lots of stuff (balls,
wadded up paper, spot markers, etc.), and
blindfolds (optional) |
| Directions |
Prepare the area by marking off a large
boundary. This can be in a circle, rectangle,
or non-geometric shape. Sometimes the metaphor
of a river is used. All the amassed stuff
is strewn about randomly inside the boundaries,
leaving room to walk between the items.
Everyone gets a partner and they discuss
a goal each would like to achieve in school.
Each person writes their goal on a post-it
note and places it on the floor inside
the boundary.
The object is to reach their goal. The
person going for the goal is blindfolded
or has his/her eyes closed. He or she is
aided in reaching the goal by his/her partner
(guide), who uses verbal directions. If,
at any time, the person touches one of
the objects, he/she must start over or
identify a distractor that keeps him/her
from achieving the goal. When the goal
is reached, it is picked up, and the partners
switch roles. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Minefield) |
- What did your partner do (or what
could your partner have done) to help
you achieve your goal?
- What were some of the problems that
arose when aiming for your goal?
- How did you choose where to put your
goal?
- Was it too easy, too hard, or just
right?
- What caused you to feel safe (unsafe)
during this activity? Could it have
been handled differently?
- As a guide, did you feel it was important
for your partner to achieve his/her
goal?
- How did you help your partner?
|
Facilitation
notes |
Since everyone is participating in this
activity simultaneously and it is a small
space, there is usually a fair amount of
noise. Some pairs work out ways to deal
with the noise, while other just try to
yell louder than everyone else. It is important
to leave the boundaries for the guide ambiguous
by not stating directly whether or not
they can be inside the boundaries. If asked
by participants, then state that it is
up to them where to be. Some will then
stay right by their partner, while others
will yell from a fixed point.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Individual trustworthiness; Communication;
Perspective taking |
| Materials |
Blindfolds (optional) and soft throwables |
| Directions |
Mark an area or place a box/bag/trash
can in the middle of the room. This is
the "hospital." Everyone has
a partner and each pair gets a soft throwable
item. The items are described as rabid
and extremely dangerous. Therefore, it
is wise to not hang on to it for too long.
The object is to throw the item, retrieve
it, and get it into the "hospital."
It must be done in this way:
- One person in the pair is either
blindfolded or closes his/her eyes.
This action makes the person immune
to the rabid nugget and he/she can
handle the item without fear of contracting
rabies.
- The other partner throws the object
a distance from the hospital.
- The partner then guides his/her blindfolded
partner to the object using verbal
instructions only. The only time he/she
may touch the partner is if he/she
encounters an obstacle and safety is
a factor.
- Once they get to the object, the
guide has his/her partner pick up the
nugget and guides him/her, verbally,
to the hospital.
- Once the item is safely in the hospital,
the two switch roles.
|
Sample
processing
questions
(Rabid Nugget Rescue) |
- Was it easier for you to be the guide
or the retriever?
- Why?
- What did you (could you) do as the
guide to help your partner feel comfortable
and establish trustworthiness?
- What were the communication issues
that you experienced?
- How did you handle them?
- Did you feel safe during this activity?
- Why or why not?
|
Facilitation
notes |
Safety issues: If an object is thrown
under a table, bench, or desk, allow the
guide to go and move it away from the barrier
so that the retriever does not have to
crawl around on the floor. Also, show the
group what might happen if a nugget is
thrown next to a wall and the guide tells
the partner to bend over to pick up the
nugget without warning them about the wall.
Since the blindfolded person is relying
on his/her partner to keep him/her from
harm, some notable issues arise around
trustworthiness, communication, and perspective
taking. Many times an object is thrown
under a desk and the guide leaves his/her
partner standing there blindfolded, but
never tells him/her that he/she is leaving,
or why he/she left. This is a communication
issue that has ramifications around building
trust and establishing trustworthiness.
It is also an issue of perspective taking
and how it might feel to be standing there,
vulnerable, and not knowing what is going
on.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Group trustworthiness; Communication |
| Materials |
Long rope and blindfolds (optional) |
| Directions |
The entire group is blindfolded, with
the exception of two people who are chosen
by the group. The two people without blindfolds
are the guides (sherpas) and it is their
job to get the entire group through a simple
obstacle course. Everyone with a blindfold
holds on to the rope and the sherpas are
shown the course they must navigate. The
group decides whether or not the sherpas
can speak to them or if this should be
done non verbally. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Sherpa Walk) |
- How were the two sherpas chosen?
- Why were they chosen?
- Did you rely only on the sherpas
or did you also help each other out?
- What did the sherpas do that helped
to get you through the course?
- What did you do to help each other
through the course?
- What kind of communication did you
need to make this work well?
- Did you feel that you could trust
your sherpas and the people around
you?
- Why or why not?
|
Facilitation
notes |
It is advisable to make the obstacle
course fairly easy the first time this
is tried. If outdoors, have the group navigate
around trees and over a log or two. If
indoors, place chairs, desks, and other
objects around the room. Later, the group
can attempt more challenging obstacles,
like going under something or having the
group weave through itself. Make sure to
emphasize the importance of taking it slow.
If someone feels unsafe, the activity can
be stopped at any time to address the safety
issue.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Risk taking; Group support |
| Materials |
None |
| Directions |
Everyone in the group is given five
minutes to prepare a 60-second speech about
anything that they wish to speak about.
They can choose to write notes, gather
props, etc. After the time is up, the group
decides the order, it can be random, volunteer,
or a system like birth dates, etc. Each
person then delivers the speech to the
group. If the group is larger than 12 or
so, have the group split into smaller groups
for the delivery of the speeches. |
Sample
processing
questions
(60-Second
Speeches) |
- How easy or difficult was this for
you to do?
- Was it easier for you to give this
speech or trust someone on a trust
walk?
- Why?
- What did the group do to support
you when giving your speech?
- What could the group have done differently
to support you when giving your speech?
- What do you risk when speaking in
front of a group?
|
Facilitation
notes |
This activity can be very threatening
to some people. It may be necessary to
help some people decide what to speak about.
Some people may opt not to give a speech
and it is important to encourage them to
do it, but not make them do it. Sometimes
they will choose to do it if someone else
is up there with them. Or they will choose
to do it on another day. If that is the
case, check in with them periodically.
As they become more comfortable with the
group, they may be ready at another time.
With some groups, it may be necessary to
discuss how they wish to behave when someone
is giving a speech. What would be most
helpful for the individuals? How can the
group support them?
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Mixing with others in group; Personal
space; Risk taking |
| Materials |
None |
| Directions |
The group begins in a circle and is
shown "bumpers up" position (hands
up in front of them). The object is to
have everyone close their eyes and get
to the other side of the circle. The first
time it is done very slowly. The successive
attempts are a little bit faster each time. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Subway Sardines) |
- What is personal space?
- How did it feel to have your personal
space invaded?
- What do you do when someone is invading
your personal space?
- Did you ever feel like opening your
eyes?
- Why or why not?
- As we went faster, did it feel more
or less uncomfortable for you?
|
Facilitation
notes |
Since this is a higher level trust activity
and some people have a very difficult time
dealing with the invasion of personal space,
it is important to remind the group about
Challenge by Choice and that they are invited
to step back and watch at any time. It
is also important to make sure that the
group does not go too fast, because collisions
can occur. Make sure to check in with them
after each round to see if they wish to
try another round. Usually, four or five
rounds are sufficient.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Trustworthiness; Communication |
| Materials |
Blindfolds (optional) |
| Directions |
Groups of three are formed and each
person is offered a blindfold. Explain
that each person will have the opportunity
to close his/her eyes and be led around
by the other two people in their group.
Talk about how to lead someone who cannot
see. First ask them how they wish to be
led (holding hands?, them holding each
person's elbow?, etc.). Then discuss possible
hazards and how important verbal communication
is when leading someone. If an obstacle
is in the way, the guides are welcome to
tell the blindfolded person what it is.
The other part of this activity involves
learning about each other. When someone
is being led, he/she has the guides's undivided
attention. That means that not only do
the guides focus on keeping that person
safe, but all conversation is directed
to and about the person being led. They
are to find out as much information about
each other as possible. Give the groups
ten minutes to walk around the school or
grounds, making sure each person gets a
chance to be blindfolded. If this is done
in a classroom, a shorter time is better. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Three Person
Trust Walk) |
- Did you feel safe when you were being
led by your guides?
- Why or why not?
- What behaviors helped to make you
feel the most safe?
- What behaviors made you feel uncomfortable?
- Did you find it easier being a guide
or being led?
- How do we learn to trust others?
|
Facilitation
notes |
Since there are at least two guides
in this activity, it makes it a good beginning
trust activity. Make sure to emphasize
that the person setting the pace is the
person who is being led around. If necessary,
make it clear that if anyone is acting
in an unsafe manner, they will be asked
to sit out for the remainder of the activity.
Since safety is the primary concern, it
is important to stress that, as the teacher/facilitator,
you will take charge of any unsafe situations.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Making mistakes; Risk taking |
| Materials |
Large jump rope |
| Directions |
This is a large group jump rope activity
that is divided into four levels. Two people
turn the rope "front door" (i.e.,
when the rope is at the top, it is coming
toward the group). The goal of each level
is to get the entire group from one side
of the rope to the other. Once the entire
group is over the rope, they can move on
to the next level.
- Level 1: People jump one at a time.
Each person must run in, jump once,
and run out. If someone misses, he/she
comes back and tries it again.
- Level 2: People jump in groups of
two or three. As a small group they
run in, jump once, and run out. Even
if one of them misses, their small
group goes back and tries it again.
- Level 3: People go in alone again.
Each person runs in, jumps once, and
runs out. If one person misses, then
the whole group must start over.
- Level 4: The same as Level 3, except
that every time the rope hits the ground,
a new person must be jumping. If there
is a miss, the whole group starts over.
|
Sample
processing
questions
(Turnstile) |
- How did this group handle it when
mistakes were made?
- How much pressure did you as individuals
put on yourselves?
- How do you usually react when you
make a mistake?
- How do you feel?
- What can the group do to help when
a mistake is made?
- What are advantages and disadvantages
to mistakes being made?
|
Facilitation
notes |
This activity can bring out the best
or worst in a group. The anxieties about
making mistakes and the pressures that
we put on ourselves and others are rampant.
During Level 1, missing does not affect
many people. Later, it affects everyone.
How does the group deal with this? Do members
fall back on put-downs and humiliation
or are they supportive? In preparation,
discuss the role of making mistakes in
learning. Talk about a trial-and-error
approach to problem solving (building models)
and the difference between making mistakes
(i.e., spelling a word wrong, forgetting
to bring your homework to school) and gross
negligence (i.e., choosing to drink and
drive, accidentally shooting someone while
hunting). It is also important to discuss
what to do when a mistake is made during
this activity. Although it may be superficial
at first, later the behaviors become internalized,
especially when participants see how helpful
encouragement can be.
Top
|
|
|
| Focus |
Trustworthiness; Working with others;
Communication |
| Materials |
None |
| Directions |
You will need an even number of people
for this activity. The group stands in
a circle and counts off. Ask all the even
numbers to raise a hand, then all the odd
numbers. Make sure that everyone knows
whether they are an even or an odd number.
They then hold hands and take a step or
two back, so that their arms are comfortably
stretched.
Explain that it is important that no one
ever lets go of hands during this activity
and that, through tension, everyone will
be holding everyone else up. On a signal,
all the odd numbered people will lean back,
while the even numbered people will lean
forward. They should lean without bending
at the waist. It is also important to stress
that no one should pull harder or softer
than anyone else and that everyone should
communicate with each other to make sure
everyone is working together. After trying
this once or twice, switch the direction
of the lean for the odds and evens. |
Sample
processing
questions
(Yurt Circle) |
- What effect did you have on the people
around you?
- What if someone had let go in the
middle of the activity?
- Did you find it easy or difficult
to trust the people around you to hold
you up?
- Did you find it easy or difficult
to trust yourself?
|
Facilitation
notes |
As long as people take this activity
slowly, there are usually no problems.
Be alert for those pulling too hard or
fast on the people next to them. Sometimes
there is also an issue with people squeezing
the hand of the person next to them very
hard just for fun. This is a good time
to bring up that building trust does not
just happen during the activity, but occurs
all of the time.
Top
|